Arguments Against Euthanasia

Search

Search

Categories

Categories

Most Popular

Social Share

by  euthanasia.com

The movement from voluntary to involuntary euthanasia would be like the movement of abortion from "only for the life or health of the mother" as was proclaimed by advocates 30 years ago to today's "abortion on demand even if the baby is half born".

by euthanasia.com

1. Euthanasia would not only be for people who are “terminally ill.”

There are two problems here — the definition of “terminal” and the changes that have already taken place to extend euthanasia to those who aren’t “terminally ill.” There are many definitions for the word “terminal.” For example, when he spoke to the National Press Club in 1992, Jack Kevorkian said that a terminal illness was “any disease that curtails life even for a day.” The co-founder of the Hemlock Society often refers to “terminal old age.” Some laws define “terminal” condition as one from which death will occur in a “relatively short time.” Others state that “terminal” means that death is expected within six months or less.

To continue click on the link below:

www.euthanasia.com/argumentsagainsteuthanasia.html